The Top 5 NHL Arenas According to Google Reviews

When asking a Nashville season-ticket holder about the best stadium in the NHL, expect a response centered on Smashville’s noise. On the other hand, a fan of the Golden Knights will most likely talk about the Strip. 

Google Reviews gives us a fair and straightforward glimpse of what people think about a place after visiting, regardless of whether they attended a hockey game, concert, or any other kind of event. These reviews can’t be considered scientific and include the opinions of fans - thousands of them! 

So I pulled the numbers and ranked the five highest-rated current NHL arenas to see what they reveal.

The methodology

Ratings change frequently, so consider this simply a snapshot. I collected Google's star rating and overall reviews for every arena hosting NHL teams, based on Google Business details listed for each. Only arenas currently hosting NHL teams were taken into account, and if there were any ties, review count was used to break them.

It’s important to note that many older, tourist-heavy arenas in cities such as Las Vegas or Los Angeles receive reviews from people who have never actually been to a hockey game, as they may have only been visiting them as part of other events such as concerts or UFC fights. Because of this, it could impact the ratings released by Google since it combines different types of events together.

The top five

The ratings listed below correspond to Google listings of the beginning of August 2026. Reviews change all the time, so make sure to check the latest information before using the data.

1. Crypto.com Arena — Los Angeles, CA

• Google rating: 4.7 (35.1K reviews)
• Home team: Los Angeles Kings
• Opened: 1999
• Capacity: ~18,200

NHL fans call it an "LA Icon," saying how organized the building is for its size, as escalators and security lines flow smoothly even when very busy. Complaints pertain mostly to slow food service in the luxury suites, and very few people have experienced any issues, so the ranking is definitely justified.

2. T-Mobile Arena — Las Vegas, NV

• Google rating: 4.7 (21.7K reviews)
• Home team: Vegas Golden Knights
• Opened: 2016
• Capacity: ~17,400

Supporters commend the location, noting that it is immaculate and roomy and has excellent sightlines from nearly all levels. Friendly staff members were noted also, but opinions varied on post-game security. Interactive food counters that monitor waiting times are especially well-received. Since the venue was constructed with fan flow in mind, the score appears to be well-deserved.

3. Bridgestone Arena — Nashville, TN

• Google rating: 4.7 (17.4K reviews)
• Home team: Nashville Predators
• Opened: 1996
• Capacity: ~17,100

Fans constantly remark on the building's acoustics and the atmosphere created by the audience, in addition to its quick security checks and better pedestrian experience in the city. Opinions seem divided with complaints directed at the high costs of food, particularly that of the famous hot chicken. The fact that Bridgestone has been dubbed one of the loudest places around corresponds with the reviews made by its visitors.

4. Amalie Arena / Benchmark International Arena — Tampa, FL

• Google rating: 4.6 (16.5K reviews)
• Home team: Tampa Bay Lightning
• Opened: 1996
• Capacity: 19,092

A quick note regarding accuracy is that the building operated as Amalie Arena all these years, but as of 2025, the building is Benchmark International Arena now, even if everyone still calls it by the old name. Reviewers are praising the open-concourse design because it allows people to watch the ice while waiting in the food line as well as the local crowd and inexpensive parking.

5. Climate Pledge Arena — Seattle, WA

• Google rating: 4.5 (9.4K reviews)
• Home team: Seattle Kraken
• Opened: 2021
• Capacity: ~17,450

Critics love the ultra-modern renovation and the eye-catching “Climate Pledge wall,” as well as the food and drink venues available in-house. The main complaints center on stringent security checks and bottlenecks at the concession stands during intermission, which is understandable given that this is still a new key location trying to figure out crowd movement logistics.

A note on accuracy: Google ratings and review counts change continuously, so treat the figures above as a snapshot from early August 2026.

What makes fans love an arena?

There are few common threads of behavior among all of the top scorers. For example, lines of sight and effectiveness of the layout come into play constantly. Fans would rather not miss the action while in the midst of ordering food rather than being trapped in another corridor that misses the game. Attitude of the staff is important as well, with many stadiums receiving accolades for the way that ushers treat guests.

In terms of walkability, the downtown area is a big plus. Four out of five venues are located in entertainment districts, which enhances the overall experience of the visit, beyond just the match. Regarding cleanliness, we have to say that cleanliness is becoming one of the constant aspects. At the same time, small details such as T-Mobile's waiting time indicators or Climate Pledge’s green initiatives receive a lot of attention in comparison to their size.

The biggest surprises in the rankings

For me, it was Climate Pledge Arena, even though it's one of the most architecturally recognized new venues in professional sports with the lowest score and smallest review base from the top five, as it still resolves issues like intermission traffic problems experienced by older venues long ago.

However, Bridgestone Arena manages to score full points for an impressive 4.7 despite being one of the oldest venues, which means that while age may make a venue less attractive to fans, the facilities can make up for that in terms of quality of the atmosphere and staff.

Are Google reviews a good way to rank arenas?

In truth, it's a double-edged sword. Leaving aside manipulative reviews and competitors talking bad about venues just because they can.

These reviews don’t measure only hockey games, they represent concerts and family-oriented shows as well as tourist attractions, which means that a certain venue’s reputation about its “hockey experience” and its Google score aren't always perfectly aligned.

Even so, there's real value here. 

The ratings are accompanied by a staggering number of reviews - tens of thousands of reviews per facility. This translates into a level of fan feedback that is missing from the traditional “best arena” rankings. Although these ratings are not the ultimate answer in terms of hockey ambiance, they provide valuable user input.

It is evident from all the data collected that the venues that fans love the most are not the most modern or appealing ones but those that are able to provide them with all the necessary conditions - from an excellent view and friendly staff to easy access to concessions. So the next time you need to argue which venue is the best in the league, you've got the receipts to back up your pick.